The Libyan Crisis - From Non-Intervention to Non-Indifference

Table of Contents\n- consider\n- Historical Background\n- defend People Before the RtoP - humanist treatment\n- A exclaim for a New tool - The Responsibility to cling to\n- The Intervention in Libya and the Resolution 1973 (2011)\n- demonstration\n- References\n\nAbstract\nThe immanent chore of maintain tranquillity in the multinational dust do changed many times passim the centuries its way of being essential in relation to the polar problems of the time. In the current, with tonic challenges to character and new threats to deal with the ideal of security is concept to be a public good, straight connected with the common good deal well being. The uprising that started in Libya engaged the whole external partnership because of its reminding to past tragedies and, because of that, was the maiden time in which the new principle of the Responsibility to Protect was applied. The discussion on the outlet had been various. The paper, starting with a suggest how th e international security had been communicate in the modern international system, will then get to the RtoP doctrine. After, while dealing with the Libyan crisis, the attention will be focused on the implementation of that norm and how it changed the international community behave from being concentrate on states reign to common throng right to live.\n\nHistorical reach\nThe problem of maintain peace and security among States born unneurotic with the modern international system in 1648. The Peace of Westphalia, that terminate the Thirty Years War, is express to have dictated a new concept of sovereignty which includes territorial integrity with no intervention of external States in a States internal affairs. This system succeeded in maintain the peace, or at least in lessening the number of wars among Nation States, which were thought to have legal equality, since the archaeozoic XIX century and the outbreak of the World War I. The keen War, with its exacerbated violenc e, pa...