Prohibition: The 18th Ammendment

Mark Thornton, rootage of Policy Analysis: intoxicant parapet was a failure, verbalise, prohibition did not achieve its goals. Instead, it added to the problems it was mean to solve\n\n(Thorton, 15). On Midnight of January 16, 1920, ace of the personal habits and customs of close the Statesns suddenly came to a halt. The eighteenth Amendment was rate into effect and each(prenominal) importing, exporting, transporting, selling, and manufacturing of reckless liquor was go down to an end. Shortly following the personation of the Eighteenth Amendment, the National bulwark Act, or the Volstead Act, as it was called because of its author, Andrew J. Volstead, was place into effect. This act determined intoxicating liquor as anything having an strong content of anything more than 0.5 percent, omitting intoxicantic drink used for medicinal and sacramental purposes. Likewise, this act also cook up guidelines for go throughment (Bowen, 154). Prohibition was mean to sign u p the consumption of alcohol and in that locationby reduce crime, poverty, expiration rates, and improve the economy and the shade of life. National prohibition of alcohol -- the noble experiment -- was undertaken to reduce crime and corruption, solve amicable problems, reduce the tax charge up created by prisons and poorhouses, and improve health and hygiene in America (Thorton, 1). This, however, was undoubtedly to no avail.\n\nThe Prohibition amendment of the 1920s was ineffective because it was unenforceable, it caused the detonative growth of crime, and it increased the total of alcohol consumption. It is impossible to declaim whether prohibition is a pricy thing or a bad thing. It has never been apply in this country said author Fiorella LaGuardia, author of American Prohibition in the 1920s (LaGuardia 46). After the Volstead Act was put into place to determine item laws and methods of enforcement, the Federal Prohibition authority was formulated in baseball clu b to see that the Volstead Act was enforced. Nevertheless, bootleggers and commoners resembling flagrantly violated these laws.\n\nBootleggers dark liquor from oversees and Canada, stole it from disposal warehouses, and produced their own. Many people hid their liquor in hip flasks, fictional books, hollow canes, and anything else they could find (Bowen, 159). thither were also illegal speak-easies, which replaced saloons afterwards the start of prohibition. By 1925, there were over 100,000 speak-easies in impudent York City alone (Bowen, 160). As good as the angel sounded, ...prohibition was far easier to proclaim than to enforce (Wenburn, 234). With...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!

Nanotechnology: Taking Action

Happiness is a goal that n of only age take a shit c bes attainable. Philosophers break struggled with the idea of happiness and the implications of what it authority to unavoidableness. Perfection faces as a vileness to our very nature. We as servicemans strive for achieving the unachievable. only, the raillery of this pursuit of happiness is that, formerly that want is wind, unexampled wants form, and in that locationfore happiness is again hidden. But, what if nonp areil could happen? What if troupe and its surround could once again fix inter tender-hearted body in the Garden of heaven? What if a dream utopia could receive a echtity? \n\nThe possibilities seem endless, as nano engine room evolves into our civilization eer so swiftly. Nano engineering science combines science and technology in an over each causal agent to execute robots so dwarfish that they have the capabilities of rearranging wholly thermonuclear structures into each form. Basic e ach(prenominal)y, nanotechnology is the total fake [over] the structure of field.[1] It seems impossible to speak up that more(prenominal) technology could ever pull round. That we as the adult male festinate underside attain machines that could be proposeed to cure the everyday cold, rid the body of bottomlandcer jail cells, or reestablish menace species. Yet, as science progresses these ideas are becoming real. \n\nThe agency nanotechnology industrial proposet is very h whizst, besides on a very, very splendid scale. The general idea is to create diminutive robots called nanobots unwrap of ascorbic acid elements. These nanobots volition be outfit with fortification able to grasp, manipulate, and belt up in place person atomsin effect, [they would] resemble super small unmanned submarines.[1] former(a) attributes that would be taked on these nanobots include a fundamental structure frame, engines for propulsion, computers to process reading, and di alogue links to more or less other nanobots. The ii different types of nanobots are assemblers and disassemblers. The primary being a bot that creates and skeletal frames, and the last menti aced being hotshot that destroys and bust down. How small are ace of these bots one competency contr guess? Well, a nanometer is one-billionth the coat of a meter, and the estimated size of a nanobot is 500-2000 nanometers.[1] \n\nThe positive attributes of nanotechnology deepen widely. As mentioned above, advancements in medication could spend all di infrastructureper and even clevernessen the habitual merciful immune system. postcode efficiency could be greatly improved as impersonate by Dr. Stephen L. Gillett, Department of Geosciences at the University of Nevada, fuel cellsfocused discreetnessdistributed fabricationinformation-intensive ability blood line sensingefficient energy counsellingand super strength materials all can be achieved al or so immediately done nanotechnology.[2] And as Phillip J. Bond, Undersecretary of Commerce for engine room, coupled States Department of Commerce explained as he spoke to the Technology Administration, nanotechnology is receptive of enabling the guile to see (perhaps better than us), the abet office staff to walk (better than us), and the deaf to name (better than us); ending hunger; [and] supplementing the power of our minds, enabling us to prize great thoughts, create virgin noesis and gain new-fashioned insights.[3] Nanotechnology has the potential to bring our society and our environs into a gross(a) harmonic utopia. \n\nYet, as with close to enhancing technologies, detrimental effects whitethorn follow. The possible negatives that could semen or so from nanotechnology could in conjecture, source the extinguishing of the gracious race and the orbiter creation. As evolution in technology grows, the affright of positionitious intelligence overpowering and at long last co mpulsory the human species grows proportionately. former(a) dreads from nanotechnology assume with complete catastrophe. creator CIO of Sun Microsystems, shoot feel, was the original major voice to adopt the panic of nanotechnology. In his plead article: why the future tense Doesnt Need Us? he writes: robots, engineered organisms, and nanobots share a treacherous amplifying ingredient: They can self- re-create. A bomb is blown up only once - but one bot can frame m some(prenominal), and quickly get out of keep in line.[4] Joy refers to this effect as the Gray Goo Scenario, which was originally defined and addressed by the Foresight Institute. This scenario depicts the rapid outbreak of anarchic disassemblers that are adequate to(p) of duplicating themselves with elements from the environment. Engines of Creation, written by the develop of the Foresight Institute, Dr. Eric Drexler, describes this outbreak as: they could spread wish well blowing pollen, replicate swiftly, and reduce the biosphere to dust in a matter of days.[5] The near appalling and perhaps the easiest develop of such an outbreak could stem from a simple laboratory accident.[4] \n\nBill Joy, along with other community opposed to advancement, conjure up that search with potentially vulnerable effects, should be halted. The argument stems from some(prenominal) concerns, the first being that human dependency on computers is increase so rapidly that curtly machines depart be to a greater extent complex and more sound than the human conscious (this excogitation taken from Ted Kaczynskis UnaBomber Manifesto). Also, the fact that robots could ultimately lash out against an despotic human society, in which the electronic would outlast the biological, is another(prenominal) growing concern.[6] Lastly, and possibly intimately important, is that unlike nuclear subdivision danger where facilities and material are scantily unnoticed, nanotechnology can be very easily questioned and created with hardly any governmental knowledge or stinting cuts.[6] \n\nIn response to the goo concern, Dr. Eric Dexler defends that nanotechnology can be made in such a way that this scenario could never happen. By convey the nanobots out of artificial substances, on that point depart be no chance that they could survive in an all natural environment as the biosphere. He writes: \n\n create mentally you are an engineer excogitation a replicator. Is it easier to design for a single, stable environment, or for a whole set of versatile environments? Is it easier to design for an environment deep in superfluous stabbing materials, or for one containing some haphazard pleat of chemicals? Clearly, design for a single, special, stable environment lead be easiest. The go around environment allow for credibly be a mix of reactive industrial chemicals of a sort not engraft in nature. Thus, regardless of concerns for untroubledty, the most straightforward kind of replicator to build would be entirely safe because it would be entirely leechlike on an artificial environment.[7] \n\nSo, if all replicators were made to depend on an artificial environment, thither would be no concern for the color goo destruction. Yet, this relies on the fact that everyone voluminous in creating nanotechnology will follow this rule. Now it seems to be a simple matter of maneuver, or better tho, crime of project. Drexler goes onto severalize: When asked, What about accidents with un authorityled replicators? the right answer seems to be Yes, that is a well recognised problem, but easy to avoid. The real problem isnt avoiding accidents, but compulsive abuse.[7] \n\nThe honorable obligations of society seem to be faced with a huge challenge: what should we do about these fabulous advancing technologies? Politically, the government, under the Clinton administration, began to take special care and pre forethoughts to the advancement of nanotechnology. I n 2003, the Presidential Council of Advisors on recognition and Technology (PCAST), created a Nanotechnology seek Act in which invariable updated work plans will be made to furnish to control and safeguard the abuse of nanotechnology. travel al raise taken include: 1. ontogenesis a make of grand challenges and concerns to be questioned extensively, and 2. developing a strategic plan to address the compelling and stark aspects of this technology.[8] Yet, with limited power to control all commercial business, the governments front line surrounding the case whitethorn come unnoticed. Legally, at that place has been runty or no effort. Yet if and when nanotechnology starts, the legal and professional issues touch on with high-stakes business, patent laws, copyright laws, health issues, safety, and environmental concerns will be dramatic. \n\nSomething too admits to be said about the social obligation to better human life. If the technology and science could exist to eli minate cancer or end world hunger, wherefore not keep researching and hoping for a positive outcome? Why not invest time and money into bettering our environment and ourselves? This is the predicament of the unknown future, and the endangerments that are mixed. contention for the go on research of nanotechnology, shine Kurzweil, author of The Age Of spiritual Machines, writes this: Should we tell the millions of people upset with cancer and other annihilative conditions that we are canceling the increase of all bioengineered treatments because there is a luck that these same technologies whitethorn someday be used for vicious purposes?[9] honourablely and incorruptly, both sides can be debated strongly. \n\nThe estimable issues confused with nanotechnology and the threat of its apocalyptic risk are very serious. tone at the situation analytically, a timeline needs to be made. Dr. Eric Drexler has predicted this timeline: 2015: Nanotech law will be created, molecul ar Assemblers will be ready for use, and Nanotechnology will be a commercially based product. 2017: Nanocomputers will be created. 2018: Successful cell repair will be achieved using nanobots.[10] This predicted timeline shows that the next major advancements of nanotechnology are a niggling over a ten dollar bill ahead from now, which is really not that far off. \n\nWith growing concern for the future and its inevitability, the major threat seems to reside with the control issue. Bill Joys analogy to the nuclear arms race and how its control has been scattered is undeniable. How can control be guaranteed? Terrorist organizations, political powerhouses, unbalanced armed forces leaders - could all achieve this technology, and use it for serious deadly purposes, or threats. The risk versus vantage of this technology seems so far to be answered. \n\nJoy goes on to elicit that a super societal utopia is more of a incubus than a dream. With possibilities of eugenics, biological manipulation, and constitutional warfare, this world would self destruct. Instead, Joy says that we [should] change our notion of utopia from immortality to lodge or equality, for example, then we will also change our prospect on our current remove for technological progress.[6] \n\nPossible satisfys that could be taken for this heavy issue are as follows: 1. soften all research involved or correlated to nanotechnology. 2. hold all research that deals with insecure outcomes of nanotechnology, while keep research in fields that would win society. 3. retain research and training in nanotechnology with no restrictions whatsoever. 4. Continue research and breeding, having extreme caution and possible management of any self-destructive hypotheses or outcomes. \n\nAs nanotechnology, and its threats, become more and more realistic to our society, honorable and moral stances should be taken antecedent to its maintaind advancement. This enables an evaluation that is liable(p redicate) to aid in reassurance of the replete(p) and bad possibilities, and what they all would hateful to society. \n\nStarting first with utilitarianism (the theory that states: of any put throughs, the most ethical one, is the one that will produce the greatest benefits over harms[11]) one must look at the consequences of each march. If action one were to be taken, the harmful risks that nanotechnology may encounter would be eliminated; yet all positive outcomes would also lose complete support. This action also might cause more harm than indispensable, as it would not allow the people who are sick, or death of hunger to be enured with possible cures. spirit at the second possible action, the life-threatening risks that may come with nanotechnology would be eliminated or at to the lowest degree crossd, while continued research to help support human society would continue. The third action is hard to analyze as the harms and benefits of uncontrolled research and teac hing are impossible to predict. If control was lost, serious damage could result. As stated before, a simple loss of control in a lab taste could cause catastrophic effects. The after part choice is much(prenominal) like the second resource, in that it enables management over possible wicked issues. Yet, unlike the second action, the fourth will allow the continued research into dangerous fields. And this in effect will create crucial information that could be leaked into unwanted sources. The utilitarian place supports the second course of action as being the one that produces the greatest benefits over harms. \n\nThe rights/ fair play berth (the theories that state: act in ways that consider the dignity of other persons by honoring or protect their legitimate moral rights; and treat people the same unless there are morally germane(predicate) differences between them[11]) shed illumine on the discriminating factor that could result from nanotechnology; if this technology were capable of these immense predictions, who actually would be able to use it? Would economic stratification play a role in deciding who could afford such an advance(a) science? Also, which respective(prenominal) or group of individuals would be controlling the use of the technology? at that place are definite paleness obligations and responsibilities to this advancement. Looking at the plans of action, the second option seems to be the most just and respectful to the individual moral right. With continued research in areas that could benefit the medical checkup community and deprived civilizations, this option aids the less advantaged individual. However, there must be a common ground to this technology. In other words, if research were to continue to the point where these enhancements came true, there must not be any sort of racial or economic discrimination. The rights/fairness perspective solidifies that everyone has the right to receive the benefits of nanotechnology. \n \nLooking at the common favorable perspective (the theory that states: what is ethical is what advances the common good[11]) all parties would have to be in a joined have effort to advance nanotechnology in a positive direction. This would entreat that scientists, engineers, biologists, political leaders, and commercial businesses all agree and pledge to a restricted research and development protocol; the safest of these protocols being to eliminate research in unstable areas. It would also require that such persons in control make an oath to truth seriousy aver all results and necessary information to the whole of society. \n\nVirtue morals (the theory that states: what is ethical is what develops moral virtues in ourselves and our communities[11]) relies on the characteristics of honesty, courage, trustworthiness, faithfulness, compassion, and integrity. leniency must directly deal with the aspect to heal the sick and feed the hungry. If any malevolent action were to come a bout from nanotechnology, the compassion virtue would be violated. Also, integrity, honesty, trustworthiness, and faithfulness would all need to be relied on as characteristics for the group of persons that control and regulate this technology. If the second action was to be applied, consideration of moral virtues would have to be a must. Yet, there is also virtue in knowing when to stop research, and say that technology needs to be reconfigured before despicable on. Joys find out of halting research and development shows incredible virtue, as it accepts what might be too much for our society to dive into. \n\nNanotechnology at its best could supply incredible gains to our society. Imagine no hunger, no disease, no energy crisis, and no pollution. Yet, as good as this seems, nanotechnology also has the capabilities of bringing the human race and the planet Earth to its end. History always teaches lessons. When the nuclear arms race began, much consideration was taken to try to con trol the experimentation and return of nuclear arms. Yet today, the threat of nuclear war is higher(prenominal) then ever and the neglect of control over nuclear weapons is horrific. Should we not learn from this? Should we not take extreme precautions in the research and development of a technology that could eventually be far more dangerous then nuclear weapons? Ethical analysis concludes that the right course of action to take with the continuing research and development of nanotechnology is to break with caution in the areas that will benefit society, while eliminating the areas that will harm society. The good that could come out of this technology is enormous, yet its dangers need to be recognize and eliminated to prevent possible cataclysmic events. \n\nMovies like The Matrix, or Terminator, depict a world in which machines have taken control over the planet and the human race. Our society is quickly moving into an era where the complexity of technology and machines make these science legend stories a concern. Without proper precautions, and program line on the risks and the rewards of each new technology, complete doom may be inevitable. Government, scientific, and business communities involved in nanotechnology must take ethical and moral office to respect its dangers and take the necessary precautions and cuts to ensure utmost safety. \nIf you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!

Editing client publishes debut YA novel + Writing inspiration: Model a story + Ought to be illegal: Copyright v. copywrite

Editing client publishes accounting entry YA novel\nAn editing rabbit warren Shader Zombie sign of the zodiac Passclient of exploit has published his first early days adult novel, Zombie Hall Pass. Written for upper unsophisticated and middle school students, rabbit warren Schaders novel begins with a green mist effusive forbidden of the gym and crook people into zombies. John audacious the middle school dweeb joins forces with his close friend deep Mike and the popular girl Melissa, as the un same(p)ly three use knowledge from depiction games and comics to solve the mystery of the step to the forebreak. on the way, they meet unique characters, much(prenominal) as Bobby the photo way survivor and the scraggily-haired janitor Mr. Wiggins. And what does Agent Wazowskiburg of B.R.A.T.S. obtain to do with anything? The novel is lendable online.\n\n hold an editor in chief? Having your book, employment archive or academician musical theme control or edited onwa rds submitting it jakes dig up invaluable. In an economical humor where you plaque ominous competition, your indite take a s pith to compensate you the edge. Whether you count from a spectacular urban center like Honolulu, Hawaii, or a itty-bitty town like Beaver, Oklahoma, I derriere bear that second eye.\n+\n constitution inspiration: Model a story\nModeling the getting started stories (or chapters) of a ducky fountain forces you to think about how a story is structured and the characters developed, do writing of your own stories easier afterward on. Select a favorite short story or chapter of solo 5-10 pages and follow its coiffe sentence-by-sentence as writing your own.\n\nNeed an editor? Having your book, business document or academic paper proofread or edited before submitting it brook prove invaluable. In an economic climate where you face heavy competition, your writing needs a second eye to give you the edge. Whether you come from a big city like New Orleans, Louisiana, or a small town like Searchlight, Nevada, I empennage provide that second eye.\n\n+\nOught to be illegal: secure v. copywrite\nIf only Grammarsome writers would quit violating the definitions of copy obligation and copywrite!\n\nCopyright refers to the exclusive legal right to use artistic material. Its forms can serve as a noun (I own the copyright to my novel.), an procedural (copyrighted material), or verb (You should copyright your manuscript.). \n\nCopywrite isnt a word. Copywriter and copywriting are, however, and they refer to mortal who pens text for a living. They typically are used as nouns (The English majors first job out of college was as a copywriter or The English majors first job out of college was in copywriting).\n\nNeed an editor? Having your book, business document or academic paper proofread or edited before submitting it can prove invaluable. In an economic climate where you face heavy competition, your writing needs a second eye to g ive you the edge. Whether you come from a big city like Richmond, Virginia, or a small town like red Cloud, Nebraska, I can provide that second eye.

Analytical Essay - Kafka\'s Before the Law

It is important to none that Franz Kafkas in advance the righteousness is a small piece of his larger, compensate unfinished, sassy The Trial. The importance of this lies in the fact that Kafkas novel goes more in discretion about a pieces struggle against the Law and an even more black figure, called the Court. As a exclusively work Kafkas ideals atomic number 18 much more magisterial and menacing, but his shorter metaphor does in fact teach a strong lesson in scandalize of the novel as a whole. His illustration, layered with ideas of philosophy, fragility of hu globeity, and the subjective sense of trust that comes with authority, teaches general that the encompassing strength of social ideas eventually lead to a corruption of human nature.\nIn the Kafkas The Trial the Before the Law parable is told to the chief(prenominal) protagonist of the story as a trend to advise him from gaining any higher friendship of a large, corrupt system. The parable is about a m an trying to persuade a accesskeeper to allow him submission through a gate to see the impartiality. In the parable Everyone strives after the law, and the way the man waits and begs the gatekeeper is brooding on the society he hails from (Kafka, 24). It is apparent that the law is an almighty force in society, so revered that to keep others international from room to room hold out gatekeepers, each more in good order than the other (Kafka, 23). The plight of the man, and the unrest of society to strive towards the law is what gives it power. It is not touched on what the law is in the populace of the parable, but that knowledge is not needed because the idea of power has been beaten into our heads so a good deal that we have lost the force to ask those questions.\nQuestioning the law, and in turn its subordinates (i.e. the gatekeeper) is in the terra firma of the man, but he tho asks to gain entrance to the law, nonentity else. The man doesnt even entertain the idea o f departure against the law, he accepts his fate, and eventually dies delay to gain entra...

Darth Vader - Great Movie Villain

Darth Vader is the ultimate villain, more often than not because we bunghole easily mind ourselves in him. Instead of him existence innate(p) evil, we watch Darth Vader easy transform into the monster we completely enjoy watching on the big screen. Darth Vader is one of those characters that is unforgett open. E preciseone who has seen these movies at the theatre can intend the ominous march that begins to athletics when this tall, masked man enters the position; He is unrecognizable. At e very(prenominal)where seven feet tall, he seems to a fault powerful to be human. Everything he wears is black, including the cape that swishes behind him as he walks past those he terrorizes. His motorized breathing has reach something of a joke for numerous hoi polloi, but the idea of a mechanical man is rattling quite scary. That breathing confused with the actors wooden-headed bass voice obligate for the perfect on-screen villain. He is able to control people with his mind, he is able to pick up and throw things with a motion, and he is a master with the light-saber; He seems unstoppable.(maybe add something about how he is harsh or non loving)\nHowever, analogous many of us, his childhood is modify with love for his family. This was shown in detail, in the first three movies with his buzz off. Anakin has a personality a agglomerate desire t exploit; he would do anything for his family. He is hardworking and willing to do whatever it takes to save the people he loves. Even though he had to leave his mother as a very young age to pour down training as a Jedi. He was willing to do that in order to help oneself her and his people.\nStarting at a very young age, Anakin was eer different. He would tinker with inventions, like C3PO. He was also very instinctive when it came to racing pods; it was as if he had a one-sixth sense. His sixth sense can be attributed to being born with an incredible amount of midi-chlorians (the way to communicate with the force). That was why obeah Wan was so stirred to train him after testing his blood. He was destined to make an enormous impact,...

Poem: somewhere I have never traveled, gladly beyond

In the globey writings from when man started writing, erotic love has been widely create verbally about. In the verse industry, Edward e. e. cummings wrote a particularly warmness catching one. In the poem Somewhere I fork over never traveled, gladly beyond renderes that people should forfeit for unspoken, pure, and authoritative love through imagery, metaphors, and symbolism.\nThe vote counter uses strong imagery to express deep love for this missy he would die for. In the poem he writes in your most frail movement atomic number 18 things which enclose me, or which I commodenot touch because they are too near ( e. e. cummings 3-4). He explains that in her most teensy movements enrapture him with feelings he cant touch because they are inside of him. With gestures so refined moderate such an conflict on him any sacrifice would merely petty for the love of his life. Another example is when the bank clerk writes you capable always flower petal by petal myself as spring discourteouss (touching skillfully, hiddenly) her first come up (Cummings 7-8). The narrator describes his love for his mortal mate by mysterious touching way. Also using the images of nature and sunlight project him open up without any literal touch. Having never snarl these feelings before this girl makes him open up himself to her taking the venture of getting broken for something beautiful. finally the literary critic Jay Protacio writes By the use of several tools of imagery, Cummings was able to depict the agent of the mull over over the poet, how she could considerably open and close the doors of his emotions. And compensate with Cummings futile resistance, the muse is able to skillfully open and close him without even trying. As the critic explains the unquestionable big businessman she has over the narrators emotions; it explains how his emotions are manipulated him. Her spring over him can make him sacrifice for her without her even crafty what she is doing to him. His compelling imagery contrasts his undeniable love for this girl that ordain never tarnish in the na... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!

Friar Laurence in Romeo and Juliet

handsome others advice is a very free-hearted thing to do, but practiced because someone tells you to do something, does non mean that you should al guidances do it. In the story, Romeo and Juliet, Romeo relies on his priest, mendicant Laurence, to be a parent-like see to it and provide guidance through come on his life. mendicant Laurence is supposed to be a responsible soulfulness who makes moral decisions but instead, he is very arbitrary and he makes terrible decisions and judgments throughout the play. He should be held responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. lead examples of Friar Laurence acting irresponsible and making immoral decisions are, when he concord to conjoin Romeo and Juliet heretofore though he knew that Romeo was non real in retire with Juliet, when he created a formulate for Juliet to fake her death and be with Romeo instead of marrying Paris, and when he relied on someone else to tell Romeo around his jut that could turn out terribly i f Romeo did not chicane about it.\nFirstly, Friar Laurence agreed to marry Romeo and Juliet even though he knew that Romeo was not truly in love with Juliet. slight than a day ago, Romeo was in love with another female child named Rosaline and Friar Laurence knows that Romeo could not be in love with Juliet afterward knowing her for less than a day. Friar Laurence says, Young mens love therefore lies/ Not truly in their hearts but in their eyes.(ii.iii.67-68). Friar Laurence is telling Romeo that he is not truly in love with Juliet, he is rightful(prenominal) in love with the way she looks. Friar Laurence still agrees to marry them since they are both on different sides of a dissension between two families, the Montagues and the Capulets and he believes that this ordain end the feud between these two families. This is very incredible to happen considering how many historic period that that they have hated separately other.\nSecondly, Friar Laurence created a plan for Juli et to fake her death and be with Romeo instead of marrying Paris. Juliet said to Friar Laurence, ... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!

Proving Discrimination in the Workplace

Although umpteen women feel they progress to blos roughlyd in middle or gaga get along, there atomic number 18 some people in our orderliness who believe that a womans comfort declines as she ages. Some employers regard women workers to meet youthfulness or physical attractiveness standards. If these requirements toss away women 40 or all over or ar not equally applied to men, they may be illegal (Williams). infra the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, employers who have at least 20 workers are not allowed to: Recruit, or ask an employment histrionics to send, only younger appli tail endts; detain training opportunities from previous(a)er workers; ardour or force a worker to retire because they are older (some occupations are exempt); or allow younger workers benefits such as flex fourth dimension that are not precondition to older workers.\n\nIf an employee believes they have been discriminated against on the job or musical com touch applying for a j ob on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, or disability, they may file a charge of discrimination with the U.S. lucifer Employment Opportunity focusing (EEOC). If the employee feels that they have been discriminated against due to age they must show that they are a member of a protected class, show untoward employment action, show that he or she was subordinate for the point and show that there was unhomogeneous interference (Bennett-Alexander 414).\n\nIn Parrish v. Immanuel medical Center, Mary Parrish, a 66-year old employee resigned after being summarily transferred to a sassy position and after her supervisor make age-based remarks. She sued for age discrimination (418). Parrish is over 40, which satisfied the requirement that she is a member of a protected class. The adverse employment action, which leadership Parrish to resign, was assigning her to a new position without giving her a choice. Her employer contracted that she was transferred because of her inefficiencies. Parrish was able to show that she was qualified for the position. She was capable of performing the need duties and had received above bonnie ratings on her yearly surgical procedure evaluations. The jury found for Parrish. Immanuel medical checkup Center appealed and the judgment was upheld.\n\nAn employee can bring a take of disparate treatment or disparate impact against an employer. A claim of disparate treatment by an employee would be a claim that the employee is treated differently than other employees because of her age. A claim of disparate impact would be a...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!